Here’s a chart that proves it:
Hmmm. . . interesting. It may be true that numbers (and social media CEO’s) don’t lie, but they have been known to bend the truth. In this case, I think we’re comparing apples and tomatoes, so the numbers aren’t really what they seem.
People go to Facebook to do a lot of things. They catch up with friends, post photos, play games, join groups and share links.
At StumbleUpon, people only go to do one thing — share links. All of the favoriting and friending at SU is all designed to lead the user back to stumbling (ie, the process browsing through a random list of URLs). So even if SU has fewer members than Facebook, it doesn’t matter because they’re entire raison d’être is link sharing.
|Marketing Pilgrim’s Social Channel is proudly sponsored by Full Sail University, where you can earn your Masters of Science Degree in Internet Marketing in less than 2 years. Visit FullSail.edu for more information.|
I’m not trying to take anything away from StumbleUpon. I like them and I believe they’re on the rise again, but these figures are like saying more people watch video on YouTube than on Facebook. I don’t even think of SU as a social network. It’s a highly sophisticated bookmarking site whose competitors are Digg and Reddit, not Facebook.
Having said all of that, I still recommend the use of StumbleUpon for pure traffic generation to your websites and blogs. A large amount of referred visitors aren’t going to convert but if you get one new customer out of it, it was worth the few moments it took to post the link.
And congrats StumbleUpon, no matter how you quantify it, it’s clear that you’re on an upswing and that’s good news all around.