Posted March 25, 2013 9:21 am by with 2 comments

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on FacebookBuffer this page

GavelSince we are on the legal kick this morning regarding what major Internet companies face when it comes to their service and the perceived lega; rights of their users an update in a case that Twitter is involved in in France is interesting.

The Verge sums up the situation well here.

Twitter has failed to reveal the authors of anti-Semitic tweets after a French court mandated the company do so, reports the AFP. The January court ruling required that Twitter hand over user data to help identify hate speech authors who live under the jurisdiction of French laws. The suit was originally filed by France’s Union of Jewish Students (UEJF), and the UEJF has now announced that it is taking further legal action against Twitter for claims that it has not complied with court orders.

Twitter has removed some of the anti-Semitic tweets but not all that are at issue. The UEJF doesn’t feel that they have gone far enough and that Twitter is essentially leaving the door open for hate speech. Twitter has responded to The Verge with the following which doesn’t paint their opposition in the greatest light.

“We’ve been in continual discussions with UEJF. They are sadly more interested in grandstanding than taking the proper international legal path for this data. We have filed our appeal, and would have filed it sooner if not for UEJF’s intentional delay in processing the court’s decision.”

In the end this is not about what the tweets said or even the people who said it, it’s about people’s right to say what they want no matter how offensive those thoughts may be. Should Twitter be the moral and ethical speech cops of the world? Personally, I don’t think so.

Hate speech sucks, that’s the easy thing to recognize and agree with in any matter. The trouble is that in order for everyone to be able to say what they want there is going to be plenty of the good, the bad and the truly ugly.

Do you think we could, or should be trying to, legislate morality in the online space or should we exercise our option to ignore it and let it die with the narrow minded few who spew it?

What’s your take?

  • Those Defense Lawyers have a funny word called “Grand Standing”, and accusing the other side of being “Shrill”. What’s even funnier is while Twitter and USA & Europe contemplate the merits of “Free Speech” in the classroom. The French Jewish classroom consists of worrying about bombing and death threats in 140 characters, or being beaten by a flashmob of punks if they’re in the wrong neighborhood at the wrong time. For viewers who may be ignorant. France is experiencing the greatest migration of jewish families away from France. Hungary is also no paradise either…. The recent take down of another cell group, with bombs ready to go and use on a school..may be just another reason why the UEJF continues to “Grandstand”. I complete disagree that the twitter accounts are lone dissident..whack jobs. They are apparatchicks and give voice to a movement which makes it abundantly clear to make Europe “Juden Free”. I would be kicking up a shit storm too. demanding the authorities to track down the owner/owners of the accounts. This is not a morality issue. This is criminal activity.

  • Titanium metal

    It is really good to visit to your post guys as we can get
    new information from here, Thanks for this awesome article..