UPDATE: Ghosemajumder has clarified that my assumptions of less than 2% should be based on “invalid clicks”, which means the actual number is more likely just a fraction of one percent!
Compete would like everyone to know that, while Yahoo may be in the middle of a shake-up – they still have more visitors than Google.
Now, if I had the clout of Danny Sullivan*, I’d be able to summon the Bill Tancer genie and see if Hitwise concurs with Compete’s data.
* At SES Danny mentioned that he was able to request data from Bill in his blog, and Bill was kind enough to comply. I’m not even sure Bill reads this blog, so I won’t hold my breath.
Update: OK, so Bill “the Genie” Tancer does read MP, and he magically appeared with some data that appears to contradict the Compete stats (with help from Matt Tatham).
I used to be among those that felt using a partial-text RSS feed would bring more people to my site. About a year ago, I realized the error of my ways – mostly because I figured Robert Scoble would never subscribe (you do now though, right Robert?) – and switched to full text feeds.
Amanda Watlington and Stephen Spencer both talked about the positive benefits of a full text RSS feed at SES, and now we have further evidence from an experiment Amit Agarwal ran on his blog.
Growth in RSS Subscribers – We added more than a 1000 new subscribers in less than a month – thanks to full feeds.
Here’s his RSS subscribers chart to prove it…
The New York Times has a lengthy article on the growth of online advertising in Great Britain, and how it’s outpacing the U.S. In fact, online advertising in Britain is growing by 40% and is expected to account for 14% of all advertising spend – more than twice the percentage in the United States.
While it may seem strange that Britain is able to go from lagging the U.S., to kicking its butt, it makes a lot of sense.
…British media are nearly all aimed nationwide in contrast to the United States newspaper and television markets, where local and regional markets are big players. These local markets in the United States have, so far, been slow to move ad money online.
A new Yahoo study, in conjunction with comScore Networks, has discovered that when combined, search and display advertising deliver profoundly better results than when used independently.
Online users who were exposed to both the search and display advertising campaigns increased their share of page views relative to competitive sites by 68 percent, and time spent by 66 percent. More importantly, among those exposed to both the search and display ads, purchases of the advertiserâ€™s products and services increased by 244 percent online and 89 percent offline compared to online users with similar behavior who were not exposed to these ads.
There’s also positive news for those seeking brand-lift.
In a recent study, Forrester Research assembled a list of 53 agencies and then selected six top providers to evaluate in-depth based on their revenues, balance of services, and enterprise focus.
There’s lots of interesting information relating to the strengths and weaknesses of each of the six top providers and tips for selecting your own vendor. You can purchase the full report for $995. Congratulations to iProspect for coming out on top, once again.
One interesting snippet of information. I knew iCrossing had been growing like crazy, but didn’t realize they’d had totally blown past by iProspect.
Here’s the top 6’s revenue numbers from SEM.
360i – $12M (SEM revenues in 2005)
iCrossing – $31.3M
IMPAQT – $7M
iProspect – $14.7M
Outrider – $10M (estimated)
Reprise Media – $15M
ClickZ has a good summary of two new studies – from Performics and Google Checkout – that show the web will be a big part of consumers holiday shopping this year.
© 2005-2014 Marketing Pilgrim, all rights reserved.
Marketing Pilgrim is a proud member of The Pilgrim Network